Sunday, October 31, 2010
Ram the Iceberg!!
Bill has this right. Much of what is so called "Progressivism" is hollow and those who subscribe to it will fold when confronted and challenged.
Thursday, October 28, 2010
Critical truths that Congress, Executive Officers and Judges ignore
James Madison, the father of our Constitution, explained well and true in the Federalist Papers: No. 45 -
The "federal government" was created with LIMITED and SPECIFIC powers and scope of operation. "FEW and DEFINED" are the words of Madison.
This was primarily to allow our Republic* to be represented outside the country in dealing with other Nations and Foreign States in matters of international commerce and war, to "coin money", "providing for the common defense", and allowing for inter-operation and acceptance of each states laws and management to create an actual "United" union of States.
It was NOT created to micro-manage and infringe the freedom, liberty and commerce of citizens or states.
Managing commerce and interactions within the state was recognized as the responsibility of the States, unless specifically and in a proscribed way granted to the federal organs - Congress, Executive branch or the Federal Courts.
Managing relationships and choices by intividuals is the right of the individual.
Within familes, it is the role and responsibility of parents to govern in the roles God created when HE declared the marriage or union of a man and a woman. HE created the family unit, and retains sovereignty over it.
God also inspired men to create our form of Constitutional Republic, unique in all the world, by and with its' founding documents, to among other things protect the "unalienable Rights" endowed upon man "by their Creator".
Self management of endowed "unalienable Rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness", as well as other rights to property, free speech, freedom of religion and the right to bear arms rests with "We, the People" to manage ourselves, ultimately being accountable to the Creator for their exercise, as the source from who they derived and were recieved as "endowed".
Is there not a tendence almost inbred in man to dominate his fellow man and serve self, especially those "elected" to public office or appointed to a position? Do many of them not seem to act like they are more interested in satisfying their needs/ego's and vanity, enriching themselves and almost exclusively serving or being beholden to those who elected/appointed them rather than serving and representing ALL those they are charged to represent, protect and defend, including the Constitution f the United States?
What about living true to their oath of office? THAT is their mission statement, job description, marching orders, etc.
Their Oath is Constitutionally mandated in Article 6 - Debts, Supremacy, Oaths
The CONSTITUTION, and all the Rights and values and principles identified therein is what they are charged to "support and defend", first and formost, not their benefactor, mentor, or even their state or their constituients. And they are specifically charged by statue and rules to NOT represent their donors, PAC's and/or their syncophants, OR themselves or their personal interests.
It is also anti-thetical to their role and responsibility to dip into the public trough to "bring home the bacon" for their state by voting and allowing their "Esteemed Collegue" to do the same!!! All for votes and to stay in power. from the largess of the public treasury.
Though speaking of a democracy and not a Constitutional Republic, the words of Alexander Fraser Tyler's Cycle Of Democracy (1770) seem to apply all to well today, to both the elected AND the electorate (my italics and bold highlight):
Are we still at dependency or are we already at the bondage stage? How can we tell - it feels much the same!!!
Why do we as voting citicizen continue to tolerate this abuse of power and in many cases treachery and treason with malice aforethought in the hallowed halls of what should be the place of trust, honesty, integrity, leadership and competence in servant representation? Is it because so many of US are "voting ourselves largess from the public treasury" through them?
It was written well and true:
While this scripture refers to priesthood authority using the power of God, I believe the principles apply to governing and servant leadership in public office as well.
Many have been called/elected, but few have have been chosen as worthy examples. Some have magnified their office and calling - be that citizen, patriot or elected official - yet far fewer than should. And the effect on the whole of our "leadership" groups and upon us individually by those who do not has been devestating.
I encourage all to vote their conscience in the current and all future elections. And I hope that conscience is in harmony with the principles and values upon which this great nation was founded, and Divine Providence without whom our endeavors are in vain.
Vote for those faithful and true, just men and women, who did and do and will support and defend the Constitution of the United States, that this great land may continue to be the land of the free and the home of the brave and it's people able to enjoy the fruits of liberty and freedom by obedience to the principles upon which it did and still does stand, so help us God.
It came to us in better shape than we currently hold it. My parents generation, many who lived through the great depression and the wars that followed at least had a clue.
Many of my generation, aka the "Me" Generation at times, and many of the X, Y and Z and subsequent generations have let it pass as sand through fingers. Our children, and our children's children's children deserve better from us and no less than a return to the faith of our fathers, our Founding Fathers, to preserve this nation as a heritage and legacy that they can enjoy and pass on to their children, as well as continue to spread throughout the world.
______
* Our governmental form is a Constitution Republic, founded on the rule of law and a representative government "OF the People, By the People and FOR the People" with the Constitution of the United States as the primary and final authoritative repository of that law.
It is NOT a Democracy, or a system of economics or politics or a social reform/equality or and philosophical -ism (Fascism, Socialism, Communism, Marxism, or even Capitalism), and especially should never be a "Demoncracy". I fear we are getting much to close to the last as we stray ever farther from the first.
Oh, and the Supreme Court is not authorized to interpret the Constitution, it is to determine the Constitutionality of new legislation and judical decisions, BASED on what was and is in the Constitution, AS IT WAS WRITTEN, not based on the thoughts of the day, and especailly NOT what passes for law and ideas from other nations and countries who have neither our Constitutional form of Government nor our history, culture or Judeao-Christian heritage.
_____
At it's foundational roots, in the heart of the founders and like minded citizens when created and today, and in it's Constitutional framework, America IS a CHRISTIAN nation. If it "IS" not as called a Christian Nation, it is at the very least closer to that than any other definition or tradition.
True, not all citizens are Christian, but that is not the definitional distinction.
The freedom "OF" (or "from"; look it up in the dictionary!) religion, specifically a governmental imposed required membership in a specific religion is a tenant of Christian faith, in direct opposition to Islam or any other that requires and compels by force of both political and religious law acceptance and allegience of it's creeds and it's God.
America is NOT nor will ever be a home or even a place for SHARIA law, unless we abdicate the very foundation upon which this nation and our society was built. They are inconsistent with each other, just as are any of the -ism's mentioned previously.
Speaking generally, public school have failed (some would say miserably so) and as generations passed parents have failed in willingness or capacity to teach our true history and heritage, and the majesty, wonder and inspired creation of our nation and the founding documents upon which it was built by men inspired by Almighty God.
Because of that to a degree, and in the absence of references to true and correct history and records, we as a people have lost our sense of identity and purpose - how "We the People", "E Pluribus Unum", came to be and who we really are as "one nation under God", in unity.
We then are subject to the snake oil salesman that would sell us any concoction with empty promises of blessings and benefits, many free, NONE of which they have the power within themselves to deliver, WITHOUT FIRST TAKING FROM US AND OTHER THEM MEANS TO DELIVER SAID "PROMISES". We are led as sheep to the shearer, or as lambs to the slaughter, but the very shepherds that we thought would feed us and protect us. We follow the words of the world (media and those who would manipulate the truth for gain and power) and forget the very WORD Himself, and His desire and will for us and this country.
We lose our way and are subject to vain and crafty deceit and the philosphies of men and the influence of evil when we take Diety out of the equation in relationship to our country. When and if we prevent honoring Jesus Christ as the God of this land, we will at that time fail to merit the promised blessings of His protection and benevolence which enable us to "prosper in the land".
A little down home discussion with Texas-bred. Comments?
10/27/2010. All rights Reserved.
“The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce. ... The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives and liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement and prosperity of the State.”And further here:
"If the new Constitution be examined with accuracy and candor, it will be found that the change which it proposes consists much less in the addition of NEW POWERS to the Union, than in the invigoration of its ORIGINAL POWERS. ... The proposed change does not enlarge these powers; it only substitutes a more effectual mode of administering them. "
The "federal government" was created with LIMITED and SPECIFIC powers and scope of operation. "FEW and DEFINED" are the words of Madison.
This was primarily to allow our Republic* to be represented outside the country in dealing with other Nations and Foreign States in matters of international commerce and war, to "coin money", "providing for the common defense", and allowing for inter-operation and acceptance of each states laws and management to create an actual "United" union of States.
It was NOT created to micro-manage and infringe the freedom, liberty and commerce of citizens or states.
Managing commerce and interactions within the state was recognized as the responsibility of the States, unless specifically and in a proscribed way granted to the federal organs - Congress, Executive branch or the Federal Courts.
Managing relationships and choices by intividuals is the right of the individual.
Within familes, it is the role and responsibility of parents to govern in the roles God created when HE declared the marriage or union of a man and a woman. HE created the family unit, and retains sovereignty over it.
God also inspired men to create our form of Constitutional Republic, unique in all the world, by and with its' founding documents, to among other things protect the "unalienable Rights" endowed upon man "by their Creator".
Self management of endowed "unalienable Rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness", as well as other rights to property, free speech, freedom of religion and the right to bear arms rests with "We, the People" to manage ourselves, ultimately being accountable to the Creator for their exercise, as the source from who they derived and were recieved as "endowed".
Is there not a tendence almost inbred in man to dominate his fellow man and serve self, especially those "elected" to public office or appointed to a position? Do many of them not seem to act like they are more interested in satisfying their needs/ego's and vanity, enriching themselves and almost exclusively serving or being beholden to those who elected/appointed them rather than serving and representing ALL those they are charged to represent, protect and defend, including the Constitution f the United States?
What about living true to their oath of office? THAT is their mission statement, job description, marching orders, etc.
Their Oath is Constitutionally mandated in Article 6 - Debts, Supremacy, Oaths
"The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States."The first Congress developed this requirement into a simple, 14-word oath:
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States."As a reminder to us, and specifically to all those who have taken the federal oath, the current oath enacted in 1884 states:
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God."What does "support and defend" mean to you? Does your elected/appointed official, judge, senator or representative exhibit that behavior in word, action and association? Are they doing it "against all enemies, foreign AND DOMESTIC"?
The CONSTITUTION, and all the Rights and values and principles identified therein is what they are charged to "support and defend", first and formost, not their benefactor, mentor, or even their state or their constituients. And they are specifically charged by statue and rules to NOT represent their donors, PAC's and/or their syncophants, OR themselves or their personal interests.
It is also anti-thetical to their role and responsibility to dip into the public trough to "bring home the bacon" for their state by voting and allowing their "Esteemed Collegue" to do the same!!! All for votes and to stay in power. from the largess of the public treasury.
Though speaking of a democracy and not a Constitutional Republic, the words of Alexander Fraser Tyler's Cycle Of Democracy (1770) seem to apply all to well today, to both the elected AND the electorate (my italics and bold highlight):
"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over lousy fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average of the world’s great civilizations before they decline has been 200 years. These nations have progressed in this sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; from faith to great courage; from courage to liberty; from liberty to abundance; from abundance to selfishness; from selfishness to Complacency; from complacency to apathy; from apathy to dependency; from dependency back again to bondage. http://www.famousquotessite.com/famous-quotes-6934-alexander-fraser-tyler-cycle-of-democracy-1770.html
Are we still at dependency or are we already at the bondage stage? How can we tell - it feels much the same!!!
Why do we as voting citicizen continue to tolerate this abuse of power and in many cases treachery and treason with malice aforethought in the hallowed halls of what should be the place of trust, honesty, integrity, leadership and competence in servant representation? Is it because so many of US are "voting ourselves largess from the public treasury" through them?
It was written well and true:
"We have learned by sad experience that it is the nature and disposition of almost all men, as soon as they get a little authority, as they suppose, they will immediately begin to exercise unrighteous dominion.(my italics added) - See Doctrine and Covenants 121:39-40 here http://scriptures.lds.org/dc/121/45.
Hence many are called, but few are chosen. "
While this scripture refers to priesthood authority using the power of God, I believe the principles apply to governing and servant leadership in public office as well.
Many have been called/elected, but few have have been chosen as worthy examples. Some have magnified their office and calling - be that citizen, patriot or elected official - yet far fewer than should. And the effect on the whole of our "leadership" groups and upon us individually by those who do not has been devestating.
I encourage all to vote their conscience in the current and all future elections. And I hope that conscience is in harmony with the principles and values upon which this great nation was founded, and Divine Providence without whom our endeavors are in vain.
Vote for those faithful and true, just men and women, who did and do and will support and defend the Constitution of the United States, that this great land may continue to be the land of the free and the home of the brave and it's people able to enjoy the fruits of liberty and freedom by obedience to the principles upon which it did and still does stand, so help us God.
It came to us in better shape than we currently hold it. My parents generation, many who lived through the great depression and the wars that followed at least had a clue.
Many of my generation, aka the "Me" Generation at times, and many of the X, Y and Z and subsequent generations have let it pass as sand through fingers. Our children, and our children's children's children deserve better from us and no less than a return to the faith of our fathers, our Founding Fathers, to preserve this nation as a heritage and legacy that they can enjoy and pass on to their children, as well as continue to spread throughout the world.
______
* Our governmental form is a Constitution Republic, founded on the rule of law and a representative government "OF the People, By the People and FOR the People" with the Constitution of the United States as the primary and final authoritative repository of that law.
It is NOT a Democracy, or a system of economics or politics or a social reform/equality or and philosophical -ism (Fascism, Socialism, Communism, Marxism, or even Capitalism), and especially should never be a "Demoncracy". I fear we are getting much to close to the last as we stray ever farther from the first.
Oh, and the Supreme Court is not authorized to interpret the Constitution, it is to determine the Constitutionality of new legislation and judical decisions, BASED on what was and is in the Constitution, AS IT WAS WRITTEN, not based on the thoughts of the day, and especailly NOT what passes for law and ideas from other nations and countries who have neither our Constitutional form of Government nor our history, culture or Judeao-Christian heritage.
_____
At it's foundational roots, in the heart of the founders and like minded citizens when created and today, and in it's Constitutional framework, America IS a CHRISTIAN nation. If it "IS" not as called a Christian Nation, it is at the very least closer to that than any other definition or tradition.
True, not all citizens are Christian, but that is not the definitional distinction.
The freedom "OF" (or "from"; look it up in the dictionary!) religion, specifically a governmental imposed required membership in a specific religion is a tenant of Christian faith, in direct opposition to Islam or any other that requires and compels by force of both political and religious law acceptance and allegience of it's creeds and it's God.
America is NOT nor will ever be a home or even a place for SHARIA law, unless we abdicate the very foundation upon which this nation and our society was built. They are inconsistent with each other, just as are any of the -ism's mentioned previously.
Speaking generally, public school have failed (some would say miserably so) and as generations passed parents have failed in willingness or capacity to teach our true history and heritage, and the majesty, wonder and inspired creation of our nation and the founding documents upon which it was built by men inspired by Almighty God.
Because of that to a degree, and in the absence of references to true and correct history and records, we as a people have lost our sense of identity and purpose - how "We the People", "E Pluribus Unum", came to be and who we really are as "one nation under God", in unity.
We then are subject to the snake oil salesman that would sell us any concoction with empty promises of blessings and benefits, many free, NONE of which they have the power within themselves to deliver, WITHOUT FIRST TAKING FROM US AND OTHER THEM MEANS TO DELIVER SAID "PROMISES". We are led as sheep to the shearer, or as lambs to the slaughter, but the very shepherds that we thought would feed us and protect us. We follow the words of the world (media and those who would manipulate the truth for gain and power) and forget the very WORD Himself, and His desire and will for us and this country.
We lose our way and are subject to vain and crafty deceit and the philosphies of men and the influence of evil when we take Diety out of the equation in relationship to our country. When and if we prevent honoring Jesus Christ as the God of this land, we will at that time fail to merit the promised blessings of His protection and benevolence which enable us to "prosper in the land".
A little down home discussion with Texas-bred. Comments?
10/27/2010. All rights Reserved.
Friday, October 22, 2010
Third time- FAIL!! Why won't/can't you quote the Constitution correctly, Mr. President!!
Open letter in response to your recent speech to the DSCC.
October 22, 2010
President Barak Obama,
For the third time in less than 6 weeks in public speech, you have misquoted the Constitution, this time by again removing the reference to “their Creator”.
Quoting YOUR statement (copy and pasted from the official online White House press release of your speech at the DSCC Dinner on October 18, 2010, using brackets inside my quote marks lest I be accused of misquoting you, with my italics added):
"[ "It has to do with this idea that was started by 13 colonies that decided to throw off the yoke of an empire, and said, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that each of us are endowed with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” ]"
Paraphrasing of quoted material INSIDE quotes is NOT a QUOTE!! A quote using quotation marks is what it is - a word for word with correct punctuation repeat of the original source statement!!
And even if the quotation marks in the press release were to have been removed, the same result applies. The misquote was either incompetent or intentional. Did you do this in your previous legal work (there was some wasn’t there? Where?) Which version of this clause did you teach in your instruction of Constitutional Law? How about as editor of the Harvard Law Review? Wow. Just WOW!!!
The correct "quote" of this line from the Declaration of Independence is this:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
Note that there is not so much as a comma before or after Creator in that phrase. It is one complete idea with all parts present- they, endowed, Creator, certain, unalienable, and Rights. Note that Rights is Capitalized!! These are not generic or common rights, but proper rights, specified rights, “certain” and “unalienable”, as in CREATOR GRANTED RIGHTS.
And the language implies there are other “Rights” besides and “among which” the explicit life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are specifically identified, but that is a separate issue and discussion for another time and place.
Your misquote totally changes the meaning of the sentence and the foundation of the whole document, it’s principles and the republic created by it when you removed the reference to “Rights” being endowed “by their Creator".
The majesty of America is NOT the simple idea that men have specific rights including life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It includes the profound humility, understanding and recognition of the existence and Supreme Sovereignty of a Creator with power to and who DID grant those rights to men.
This was and still is a paradigm shift from most of the world’s founding documents – the idea that certain unalienable rights of men's were endowed, or come from "their Creator", NOT from some public official or a government or other man-mad organization, AND that government is not of/by/for or from those “governing”.
This means the Rights can neither be granted, taken, restricted or changed BY those “governing”, but that those Rights rest in the hands and hearts of the “governed” through endowment from “their Creator”. Not from those governing any more than not from themselves, not from nature or the Big Bang either!! .
Here that means WE, the PEOPLE”, NOT YOU the officers of government are the nation. It means “this nation, under God” meaning We, the PEOPLE, have the power of government. Rights reside in We, the PEOPLE individually, and we organized government to maintain that liberty and those Rights that “this nation, under God,” would be preserved.
America – The United States of America – WE, the PEOPLE of THIS NATION!!!
America, the nation and government “of” (meaning "from") WE, the PEOPLE. This is the vision of Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address when he referred in his famous phrase, “that this nation, under God, … and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth".
THIS IS US, united together as OUR NATION, that “nation, under God” created by the Constitution of the United States - of, by and for the people of the United States of America, and by those brave patriots now dead who shall not have died in vain if we can but keep our nation grounded in it’s foundation.
That foundation is the Constitution of the United States and the principles and values it contains. Freedom, liberty and our unalienable Rights are NOT based on any other *ism or agenda or school of thought or interest group whose “rights” have been stepped on. It is not about political, religious or economic or even environmental concerns, although those are important issues of discussion. The foundation is not based on the philosophy or idea of an individual or group, be they progressive, socialist, Marxists, libertarian, or even democratic, religious or theocratic, etc.. It is not what you are making it out to be.
You and those with you can NOT take “their Creator” out of the equation without changing the foundation and the identity and capacity of the object on which foundation it rests. You and those with you do NOT have that right, nor that authority to wrest, change or overturn the founding documents and principles upon which this nation was formed.
If you continue to try to change it or take it - be that by executive order or action, legislative fiat, judicial “interpretation”, legal manipulation, collusion or treachery or treason, or by selective enforcement or military or physical force or even community organizing, WE, the PEOPLE will remind you of your error and folly.
Lincoln’s quote from the Gettysburg Address as posted on your official website (http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/presidents/abrahamlincoln) reads:
"that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain--that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom--and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."
Speaking of Lincoln, Wikipedia comments and references him on the subject of referring to that phrase that you MISquoted in your speech:
"The famous wording of the Declaration ...and has come to represent for many people a moral standard for which the United States should strive. This view greatly influenced Abraham Lincoln, who considered the Declaration to be the foundation of his political philosophy,[4] and who promoted the idea that the Declaration is a statement of principles through which the United States Constitution should be interpreted."
You dishonor that moral standard by intention or incompetence or ignorance. All are the same. You are not a king or a ruler, although in my opinion you speak and act like one. You are not even a leader, in the spirit of that word. My opinion is stated thus:
"While you may have assumed the office, uttered the oath and hold the rank, you have neither magnified the office or obeyed the oath or revered or earned the respect of the rank".
In my personal opinion, you are not worthy of the office you hold, and have been treasonous to the trust placed in you - YOU - AND all those elected and appointed who have ignored or failed to honor their oath to “preserve, protect and defend" our glorious and majestic Constitution, with it's accompanying Bill of Rights.
As a reminder, here is the wording of the oath of office of President of the United States. This is now YOUR OATH, the one you made in front of “We, the People” and that same “Creator” who endowed us with unalienable Rights.
From the United States Constitution, Article Two, Section One, Clause Eight:
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
The Vice-President and Members of Congress take this oath, declared by statue here:
U.S. Code (TITLE 5 > PART III > Subpart B > CHAPTER 33 > SUBCHAPTER II > § 3331):
An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath:
“I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”
This section does not affect other oaths required by law.
YOU took an oath to “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States,” and to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States”, and by extension the ideals, values and principles IT states. You are NOT free to preserve, protect and defend YOUR interpretation and misleading paraphrased “quote” of the same.
You don't (or if you can't, it is the same either way) at minimum QUOTE IT CORRECTLY!!! You don't follow it and abide by it or uphold it, much less “preserve, protect and defend” it. Are you and those who do likewise the foreign and domestic enemies against which it must be defended? Is this speaking truth to power?
And then you end your speech with what appears to be a politically correct "God bless you"? Is this not hypocritical, as I think many if not most believe that "their Creator" and "God" to be the same to them, even if their definition of either differs from someone else’s?
This is the third time you have PUBLICALLY done this in your official capacity is a matter of WEEKS!!!. This was not a private conversation. Your words were published as official "The White House" letterhead styled postings.
Your words as spoken are either intentional or incompetent. Either is cause for termination of your employment, including all who agree with you or support your statements, speech or actions or by their silence approve/condone/concur. It looks like a spirit of treason to me. I believe it to be evidence of the "vain and aspiring men" to which Samuel Adam's warned.
And you and the other appointed/elected officials want to be re-elected for doing this? REALLY??? I have a vote to say about this, and so do hundreds of millions of other real AMERICANS. We, the PEOPLE who believe in a constitutionally based REPUBLIC will have much to say (VOTE) about this.
And I believe you and they will be TEKEL, as stated in Daniel 5:27:
"TEKEL; Thou art weighed in the balances, and art found wanting."
I and millions of like-minded patriots will I hope vote to FIRE you and all who agree with you and who condone your actions (openly or by their silence or inaction) and thus appear to hold the values that you express by your words and actions.
If intentional (this is the THIRD TIME IN how many WEEKS?), it is grounds for termination. If this is the “best of your ability, then termination is still in order for incompetence and/or inability to perform the duties of the job. THAT’S how it works in the real world. If it were up to me, I would fire you for cause and void all future personal benefits for your "time" in office.
I refer all readers to my current profile quote, which I will include here in case as is may be changed.
"If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin." - Samuel Adams
(if my quote of Adams is mis-quoted in any way, please let me know and include an authoritative link to original source documentation or a copy of the same. Thank you)
And yeah, I know this is probably too long (from a PC perspective for FB anyway, which is where this epic started, one simple link to my profile) instead of just posting it on my blog as first-amendment protected free speech. (I finally did!) It is my "open letter" to President Barak Obama in reference to his speech posted on HIS and The White House's official website here:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/10/19/remarks-president-a-dscc-dinner-rockville-maryland
I am including the link to his talk lest the reference to the post in Facebook gets disconnected from my comments.
I reserve all rights, including author rights and copyrights.
And this has noting to do with my color, race or religion - or yours, or anyone else’s’, be they the same or different. For someone to play that card and call me racist or bigoted or even extreme would expose THAT person as the racist or bigot or extremist. It is ALL about the oath you took and the principles upon which this republic was founded and yet still stands, no thanks to you and those in collusion with you, direct or indirect, and your failure to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
Also referenced here: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=218225
Copy and pasted link from the official press release on www.whitehouse.gov with text following:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/10/19/remarks-president-a-dscc-dinner-rockville-maryland
The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
October 19, 2010
Remarks by the President at a DSCC Dinner in Rockville, Maryland
October 18, 2010
8:03 P.M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT: Good evening, everybody. Thank you so much. It is wonderful to see all of you. Rajeev and Seema and your wonderful children, thank you for your extraordinary hospitality -- and bringing your mom, who I love. It’s wonderful to see her. And, Seema, your parents -- it’s wonderful to meet them as well.
I want to, before I begin, just say that, Maryland, you are graced with two of the finest senators in the United States Senate in Barbara Mikulski and Ben Cardin. (Applause.) We are so proud of them. Everything that I've been able to accomplish over the last couple of years has been because I had these great partners. And these are two of the best partners, and they were also wonderful colleagues when I was in the United States Senate. And so I am just truly blessed to have them with me.
Rajeev’s introduction was so eloquent I almost don't want to add to it. But I think that he touched on the essence of what this upcoming election is about and what this historical moment is about.
Most of us here came from someplace else -- or our parents came from someplace else, or our grandparents, our great grandparents came from someplace else. And they were inspired by a particular idea, this idea of America. As wonderful as the land is here in the United States, as much as we have been blessed by the bounty of this magnificent continent that stretches from the Atlantic to the Pacific, what makes this place special is not something physical. It has to do with this idea that was started by 13 colonies that decided to throw off the yoke of an empire, and said, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that each of us are endowed with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”
And that idea, over the course of 200-plus years, evolved into an understanding not just here in America but around the world that in the United States, if you were willing to make the effort, if you're willing to apply the energy that your parents applied when they came here, if you were willing to make sacrifices for the future and not just think about short-term gain, that somehow it would be possible for you to achieve dreams that someplace else you might never imagine possible.
And that American Dream is what inspired me, and I suspect inspired Barbara and Ben, to get into public service -- because what we understood was that although the essence of the American Dream is that each individual can succeed, what underwrites that dream is also the understanding that we're all in this together and that it’s incumbent upon us to make sure that we're creating the climate, the environment, the opportunity for everybody to succeed -- not just some people to succeed. There’s no caste system in the United States of America. Anybody who is willing to make the effort can succeed.
And part of why this is such an historical moment is, frankly, over the last decade that idea that ended up creating this emerging middle class that became the engine of our economic growth and the envy of the world has been pretty hard hit. Obviously it’s been hard hit by this recession, but I want to go before the recession. The period from 2001 to 2009, every middle-class family lost about 5 percent of its income. During that same period, job growth was more sluggish than it had been at any time since World War II. There was a sense on the part of, I think, a lot of ordinary Americans that no matter how hard they tried, it was becoming more and more difficult to make it.
And the things that helped to make America the envy of the world -- our infrastructure, our education system, our health care systems -- all those things had become -- had begun to break down in pretty substantial ways, so that whereas we used to rank number one in the proportion of college graduates, by 2009-2010, we ranked 9th or 10th. Our students now rank -- 15-year-olds typically rank 21st in science and 25th in math in the world, where we used to be number one.
Our health care system was broken, wildly expensive, leaving 30 million without health insurance and burdening families, businesses and the federal treasury, as well as state treasuries.
Our infrastructure, which used to be the best in the world, suddenly we have bridges that are falling apart, airports that are outdated and making a very unpleasant experience for those of you who still have to travel through commercial flights. I’ve got to admit I’ve got my own plane now, so it’s a little easier for me. (Laughter.)
And so when I ran for President two years ago, we already knew that we had to change direction, that we had to deal with some of these fundamental challenges that we’ve been putting off for years: education, energy, health care, infrastructure. We had to make sure that we were creating an environment in which people could, in fact, succeed, and they were rewarded for their hard work and their responsibility -- not for reckless risk-taking, not for short-term thinking.
This was all before the crisis hit -- the worst financial crisis that we’ve experienced since the Great Depression. So my first job, Barbara’s first job, Ben’s first job when we got back in -- when I was sworn in, in January of 2009, we had lost 4 million jobs in the six months that preceded me being sworn in, 750,000 the month that I was sworn in, 600,000 the month after that, 600,000 the month after that. My first job was to stop the crisis.
And we did that. And sometimes that took some unpopular decisions. But I wasn’t elected to do what was easy; I was elected to do what was right. And so since that time, over the course of 20th months, whereas we were -- the economy was shrinking when I took office, the economy is now growing again. Where we were losing jobs, we’ve now seen nine consecutive months of public-sector job growth -- of private-sector job growth.
So not only did we deal with the crisis, but we also started finally making progress on all those things that we’ve been putting off. So, Rajeev talked about clean energy and the efforts of his company. One of our first tasks in the Recovery Act was figuring out how do we not only boost demand and make sure that we’re dealing with this crisis, but also how do we invest in some long-term thinking. And so we made the largest clean energy investment in our history.
Then we said if we really want to jumpstart education, what do we need to do? And we started something called Race to the Top, that is now investing in competition in states all across the country, making sure that they’re focused on proven mechanisms to boost math learning and science learning, and make sure that we've got the best possible teachers in the classroom.
And then we said, well, how do we make sure that every young person can go to college once they get through that high school? And we shifted billions of dollars that were going to banks in the form of unwarranted subsidies and we took that money and we made sure that that money was going directly to student loans and Pell Grants so that young people would never feel as if they were barred from opportunity simply because they didn’t come from a wealthy family.
And, yes, then we took on health care -- because we understood that if we didn’t start taking it on now we would continue to see a system in which we were subsidizing a system that wasn’t working for too many Americans and too many businesses. And because of those efforts we now can say to the American people that if you don't have health insurance you’re going to be able to get health insurance. It’s affordable. And if you do have health insurance, then insurance companies are going to have to treat you fairly. And in the process, we're going to start making the system overall more efficient so that suddenly doctors and hospitals are thinking in more innovative ways about how we can improve system deliveries, and we suddenly are investing in health information technology, so instead of having multiple tests, you can take one test and have it emailed to every doctor and specialist that you're dealing with, and that over time we're going to bring down the cost of health care for everybody.
All these efforts we made because we had folks like Ben and Barbara there who were willing to think not about the next election, but about the next generation. And that's a hard thing for politicians to do -- because we live in an environment in which politics has become meaner and coarser than it used to be; where millions of dollars of negative ads are thrown at candidates; where, frankly, what used to be a spirit of occasional bipartisanship in order to get things done has now given way to constant partisanship so that over the last two years, we've had Republicans not supporting us even on issues that they used to sponsor simply because these were issues that we supported.
So it’s not easy for elected officials to think long term. And yet, because of the challenges we face, because or the emergency situation we were in, that's what we saw a whole bunch of legislators do. And I couldn't be prouder of what we accomplished together over the last two years.
But we also know that our work is unfinished. We were just talking about clean energy. The fact of the matter is, we still don't have an overarching energy policy that makes sense for the future -- for the 21st century. So we’ve got to make more investments in innovation, in research and development in clean energy -- because I want the solar panels and the wind turbines and the biodiesel and other clean-energy approaches that are available, I want those investments made right here in the United States of America. And in order for us to do that, I’ve got to have a Congress that, again, is willing to think long term.
We’ve still got a lot more work to do with respect to education reform. And when I see my Republican colleagues suggesting that we might cut education spending by 20 percent, at a time when I know that China and South Korea and Germany are not cutting education by 20 percent -- they understand this is going to be the single most important determinant of how well we’re able to compete in the 21st century. And I know that I’ve got to have some partners in Congress who understand what’s at stake.
We’ve got to rebuild our infrastructure. We just got started with the Recovery Act. Even though I know that there’s a lot of road work being done all across the country and here in Maryland as well, we still have $2 trillion worth of infrastructure that's crumbling, unattended to, that we’re going to have to rebuild. And what an opportunity -- at a time when interest rates are low, when contractors are coming in under budget, people are desperate for work, construction workers have been laid off because the housing bubble burst -- for us to put those folks back to work doing the work that America needs done.
We’ve still got to get control of our deficit in a serious way. And that's going to require more than just platitudes; it’s going to require tough choices. And the question is going to be do we have people in place who are making those choices not based on what’s politically expedient or what special interests are lobbying for, but rather what’s good for America over the long term.
So we’ve got a lot of work to do. I try to explain to folks who, in a town like Washington where everybody is watching the polls day to day, everybody is obsessed with sort of short-term thinking, I try to explain, we’re just in the first quarter. We’ve got a big chunk of the game left to play. And I need to have teammates who are thinking about that story that Rajeev told, that essential part of America that we have to make sure is there for the next generation, for these young people, an America in which everybody has opportunity.
And that's what this election is about. That's the choice in this election. Now, this is a difficult political environment right now. Unemployment is still 9.6 percent. And that means it doesn’t matter how good of a job you’ve done, people want to know what are you going to do now.
And the way I’ve been describing it around the country, it’s as if the Republicans drove the economy into the ditch. And Barbara and Ben and me, we’ve gone into the ditch, and we’ve been pushing the car out. (Laughter.) And we finally got the car out, and the Republicans suddenly tap us on the shoulder and say, well, we want the keys back -- after not having lifted a finger to help us get the car out of the ditch. And we have to explain to them, well, you know, you can’t have the keys back because you don't know how to drive. (Laughter.) You can drive with us. You can -- we’ll have to put you in the backseat. (Laughter.)
But it’s still a challenging environment. And so the support that you’re providing is going to make a difference in us making the case for why we’ve got to keep moving forward; why we can’t go backwards; why we can’t go back to the economic policies that resulted in this mess in the first place.
And I am absolutely confident that if all of you are talking to your friends and talking to your neighbors and talking to your coworkers, if we have the resources to be able to get our message out -- not just here in Maryland, but all across the country -- that the American people, they still want to dream big. They still believe in that story that Rajeev told because they know that it was true for their family, as well. It’s been true for generations of Americans.
I’ll close just by telling a quick story about the highlight not just of my day but probably of my week, maybe of my month.
We hosted a science fair today at the White House. This is the first time that we’d ever hosted a science fair at the White House. (Applause.) And the reason we did it was because I kept on having over these championship basketball teams and football teams. We had the Alabama Crimson Tide. We had the New Orleans Saints. We had the Los Angeles Lakers. And it’s a lot of fun having these great sports teams come by. And I said, but how about all these kids who are involved in science and math and engineering? Why aren’t we celebrating them?
So we hosted this science fair. And they actually set up exhibits in the State Dining Room. And this was just a sampling of some of the young people that we’d invited. And you walk through, and at each booth you met the most amazing young people you would ever care to -- ever care to meet.
There was a team from Tennessee that had designed a self-powered water filtration plant. It had a water wheel on it and it ran the battery that then filtered the water. And they explained that up in the Appalachian regions, a lot of homes still didn't have clean water and this was a cheap way to do it. For a thousand bucks, you could provide all the water that 60 or 70 families needed. Just designed it -- high school kids.
You had robots that were running around doing all kinds of things. (Laughter.) And there was a family -- young children who had emigrated from Turkey that were now in public schools here, and they had designed a whole town that would be more energy-efficient, and had created a whole model for how it could be done.
And then there was this -- the last person I spoke to was a young woman, looked like she was of Chinese heritage; lived in Dallas; 16 years old. When she was a freshman in high school, she studied biology and became interested in life sciences and became interested in cancer research. So she decided during the summer to teach herself chemistry -- (laughter) -- taught herself chemistry, and designed as a science project exploration of the development of a new cancer drug, based on some experimental cancer drugs that are currently being put together that involve injecting the drug and then it’s activated by light. And it allows a more localized treatment that isolates the cancer cells -- kills the cancer cells but leaves the healthy cells untouched.
And the problem is clinical trials and treatments have shown that it’s okay for skin cancer and other diseases where they're close to the surface, but it’s harder to penetrate. Bottom line is she decided she was going to design a new drug that would work better for harder-to-reach cancers -- having taught herself chemistry -- (laughter) -- at 16 years old.
She went on to win the international science competition. And now she and her teacher, her high school science teacher, are being approached by laboratories all across the country who want to collaborate with them in thinking about this new potential breakthrough cancer drug.
So I’m talking to her, pretending like I understand everything that she’s saying. (Laughter.) And I’m thinking to myself, think about what this means. You’ve got the portrait of Lincoln in the State Dining Room looking down over us. You’ve got an African American President named Barack Obama. You’ve got a young Chinese American girl, 16 years old, who is designing cancer drugs, having taught herself chemistry in high school. That idea of America is alive and well. But we have to nurture it, and we have to sustain it.
And for all the meanness of our political season and the yelling and nonsense that we see day in and day out on television, that is something that is worth remembering -- because I think sometimes during difficult times, some of us may get discouraged or lose heart.
I don't want you to be discouraged. Just think about those young people, think about the young people who are here. Think about Rajeev and his family and Seema and her family, and think about Barbara and Ben and their families, when they emigrated. That story continues. We just have to build on it. We have to have confidence in it.
And we have to remember that as long as we’re unified as opposed to divided, as long as we think towards the future and not just towards the present, that America will prosper, and that the 21st century will be the American Century, just as the 20th was.
Thank you so much, everybody. God bless you. (Applause.)
END 8:25 P.M. EDT
October 22, 2010
President Barak Obama,
For the third time in less than 6 weeks in public speech, you have misquoted the Constitution, this time by again removing the reference to “their Creator”.
Quoting YOUR statement (copy and pasted from the official online White House press release of your speech at the DSCC Dinner on October 18, 2010, using brackets inside my quote marks lest I be accused of misquoting you, with my italics added):
"[ "It has to do with this idea that was started by 13 colonies that decided to throw off the yoke of an empire, and said, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that each of us are endowed with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” ]"
Paraphrasing of quoted material INSIDE quotes is NOT a QUOTE!! A quote using quotation marks is what it is - a word for word with correct punctuation repeat of the original source statement!!
And even if the quotation marks in the press release were to have been removed, the same result applies. The misquote was either incompetent or intentional. Did you do this in your previous legal work (there was some wasn’t there? Where?) Which version of this clause did you teach in your instruction of Constitutional Law? How about as editor of the Harvard Law Review? Wow. Just WOW!!!
The correct "quote" of this line from the Declaration of Independence is this:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
Note that there is not so much as a comma before or after Creator in that phrase. It is one complete idea with all parts present- they, endowed, Creator, certain, unalienable, and Rights. Note that Rights is Capitalized!! These are not generic or common rights, but proper rights, specified rights, “certain” and “unalienable”, as in CREATOR GRANTED RIGHTS.
And the language implies there are other “Rights” besides and “among which” the explicit life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are specifically identified, but that is a separate issue and discussion for another time and place.
Your misquote totally changes the meaning of the sentence and the foundation of the whole document, it’s principles and the republic created by it when you removed the reference to “Rights” being endowed “by their Creator".
The majesty of America is NOT the simple idea that men have specific rights including life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It includes the profound humility, understanding and recognition of the existence and Supreme Sovereignty of a Creator with power to and who DID grant those rights to men.
This was and still is a paradigm shift from most of the world’s founding documents – the idea that certain unalienable rights of men's were endowed, or come from "their Creator", NOT from some public official or a government or other man-mad organization, AND that government is not of/by/for or from those “governing”.
This means the Rights can neither be granted, taken, restricted or changed BY those “governing”, but that those Rights rest in the hands and hearts of the “governed” through endowment from “their Creator”. Not from those governing any more than not from themselves, not from nature or the Big Bang either!! .
Here that means WE, the PEOPLE”, NOT YOU the officers of government are the nation. It means “this nation, under God” meaning We, the PEOPLE, have the power of government. Rights reside in We, the PEOPLE individually, and we organized government to maintain that liberty and those Rights that “this nation, under God,” would be preserved.
America – The United States of America – WE, the PEOPLE of THIS NATION!!!
America, the nation and government “of” (meaning "from") WE, the PEOPLE. This is the vision of Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address when he referred in his famous phrase, “that this nation, under God, … and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth".
THIS IS US, united together as OUR NATION, that “nation, under God” created by the Constitution of the United States - of, by and for the people of the United States of America, and by those brave patriots now dead who shall not have died in vain if we can but keep our nation grounded in it’s foundation.
That foundation is the Constitution of the United States and the principles and values it contains. Freedom, liberty and our unalienable Rights are NOT based on any other *ism or agenda or school of thought or interest group whose “rights” have been stepped on. It is not about political, religious or economic or even environmental concerns, although those are important issues of discussion. The foundation is not based on the philosophy or idea of an individual or group, be they progressive, socialist, Marxists, libertarian, or even democratic, religious or theocratic, etc.. It is not what you are making it out to be.
You and those with you can NOT take “their Creator” out of the equation without changing the foundation and the identity and capacity of the object on which foundation it rests. You and those with you do NOT have that right, nor that authority to wrest, change or overturn the founding documents and principles upon which this nation was formed.
If you continue to try to change it or take it - be that by executive order or action, legislative fiat, judicial “interpretation”, legal manipulation, collusion or treachery or treason, or by selective enforcement or military or physical force or even community organizing, WE, the PEOPLE will remind you of your error and folly.
Lincoln’s quote from the Gettysburg Address as posted on your official website (http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/presidents/abrahamlincoln) reads:
"that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain--that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom--and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."
Speaking of Lincoln, Wikipedia comments and references him on the subject of referring to that phrase that you MISquoted in your speech:
"The famous wording of the Declaration ...and has come to represent for many people a moral standard for which the United States should strive. This view greatly influenced Abraham Lincoln, who considered the Declaration to be the foundation of his political philosophy,[4] and who promoted the idea that the Declaration is a statement of principles through which the United States Constitution should be interpreted."
You dishonor that moral standard by intention or incompetence or ignorance. All are the same. You are not a king or a ruler, although in my opinion you speak and act like one. You are not even a leader, in the spirit of that word. My opinion is stated thus:
"While you may have assumed the office, uttered the oath and hold the rank, you have neither magnified the office or obeyed the oath or revered or earned the respect of the rank".
In my personal opinion, you are not worthy of the office you hold, and have been treasonous to the trust placed in you - YOU - AND all those elected and appointed who have ignored or failed to honor their oath to “preserve, protect and defend" our glorious and majestic Constitution, with it's accompanying Bill of Rights.
As a reminder, here is the wording of the oath of office of President of the United States. This is now YOUR OATH, the one you made in front of “We, the People” and that same “Creator” who endowed us with unalienable Rights.
From the United States Constitution, Article Two, Section One, Clause Eight:
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
The Vice-President and Members of Congress take this oath, declared by statue here:
U.S. Code (TITLE 5 > PART III > Subpart B > CHAPTER 33 > SUBCHAPTER II > § 3331):
An individual, except the President, elected or appointed to an office of honor or profit in the civil service or uniformed services, shall take the following oath:
“I, AB, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”
This section does not affect other oaths required by law.
YOU took an oath to “faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States,” and to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States”, and by extension the ideals, values and principles IT states. You are NOT free to preserve, protect and defend YOUR interpretation and misleading paraphrased “quote” of the same.
You don't (or if you can't, it is the same either way) at minimum QUOTE IT CORRECTLY!!! You don't follow it and abide by it or uphold it, much less “preserve, protect and defend” it. Are you and those who do likewise the foreign and domestic enemies against which it must be defended? Is this speaking truth to power?
And then you end your speech with what appears to be a politically correct "God bless you"? Is this not hypocritical, as I think many if not most believe that "their Creator" and "God" to be the same to them, even if their definition of either differs from someone else’s?
This is the third time you have PUBLICALLY done this in your official capacity is a matter of WEEKS!!!. This was not a private conversation. Your words were published as official "The White House" letterhead styled postings.
Your words as spoken are either intentional or incompetent. Either is cause for termination of your employment, including all who agree with you or support your statements, speech or actions or by their silence approve/condone/concur. It looks like a spirit of treason to me. I believe it to be evidence of the "vain and aspiring men" to which Samuel Adam's warned.
And you and the other appointed/elected officials want to be re-elected for doing this? REALLY??? I have a vote to say about this, and so do hundreds of millions of other real AMERICANS. We, the PEOPLE who believe in a constitutionally based REPUBLIC will have much to say (VOTE) about this.
And I believe you and they will be TEKEL, as stated in Daniel 5:27:
"TEKEL; Thou art weighed in the balances, and art found wanting."
I and millions of like-minded patriots will I hope vote to FIRE you and all who agree with you and who condone your actions (openly or by their silence or inaction) and thus appear to hold the values that you express by your words and actions.
If intentional (this is the THIRD TIME IN how many WEEKS?), it is grounds for termination. If this is the “best of your ability, then termination is still in order for incompetence and/or inability to perform the duties of the job. THAT’S how it works in the real world. If it were up to me, I would fire you for cause and void all future personal benefits for your "time" in office.
I refer all readers to my current profile quote, which I will include here in case as is may be changed.
"If ever time should come, when vain and aspiring men shall possess the highest seats in Government, our country will stand in need of its experienced patriots to prevent its ruin." - Samuel Adams
(if my quote of Adams is mis-quoted in any way, please let me know and include an authoritative link to original source documentation or a copy of the same. Thank you)
And yeah, I know this is probably too long (from a PC perspective for FB anyway, which is where this epic started, one simple link to my profile) instead of just posting it on my blog as first-amendment protected free speech. (I finally did!) It is my "open letter" to President Barak Obama in reference to his speech posted on HIS and The White House's official website here:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/10/19/remarks-president-a-dscc-dinner-rockville-maryland
I am including the link to his talk lest the reference to the post in Facebook gets disconnected from my comments.
I reserve all rights, including author rights and copyrights.
And this has noting to do with my color, race or religion - or yours, or anyone else’s’, be they the same or different. For someone to play that card and call me racist or bigoted or even extreme would expose THAT person as the racist or bigot or extremist. It is ALL about the oath you took and the principles upon which this republic was founded and yet still stands, no thanks to you and those in collusion with you, direct or indirect, and your failure to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
Also referenced here: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=218225
Copy and pasted link from the official press release on www.whitehouse.gov with text following:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/10/19/remarks-president-a-dscc-dinner-rockville-maryland
The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release
October 19, 2010
Remarks by the President at a DSCC Dinner in Rockville, Maryland
October 18, 2010
8:03 P.M. EDT
THE PRESIDENT: Good evening, everybody. Thank you so much. It is wonderful to see all of you. Rajeev and Seema and your wonderful children, thank you for your extraordinary hospitality -- and bringing your mom, who I love. It’s wonderful to see her. And, Seema, your parents -- it’s wonderful to meet them as well.
I want to, before I begin, just say that, Maryland, you are graced with two of the finest senators in the United States Senate in Barbara Mikulski and Ben Cardin. (Applause.) We are so proud of them. Everything that I've been able to accomplish over the last couple of years has been because I had these great partners. And these are two of the best partners, and they were also wonderful colleagues when I was in the United States Senate. And so I am just truly blessed to have them with me.
Rajeev’s introduction was so eloquent I almost don't want to add to it. But I think that he touched on the essence of what this upcoming election is about and what this historical moment is about.
Most of us here came from someplace else -- or our parents came from someplace else, or our grandparents, our great grandparents came from someplace else. And they were inspired by a particular idea, this idea of America. As wonderful as the land is here in the United States, as much as we have been blessed by the bounty of this magnificent continent that stretches from the Atlantic to the Pacific, what makes this place special is not something physical. It has to do with this idea that was started by 13 colonies that decided to throw off the yoke of an empire, and said, “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that each of us are endowed with certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”
And that idea, over the course of 200-plus years, evolved into an understanding not just here in America but around the world that in the United States, if you were willing to make the effort, if you're willing to apply the energy that your parents applied when they came here, if you were willing to make sacrifices for the future and not just think about short-term gain, that somehow it would be possible for you to achieve dreams that someplace else you might never imagine possible.
And that American Dream is what inspired me, and I suspect inspired Barbara and Ben, to get into public service -- because what we understood was that although the essence of the American Dream is that each individual can succeed, what underwrites that dream is also the understanding that we're all in this together and that it’s incumbent upon us to make sure that we're creating the climate, the environment, the opportunity for everybody to succeed -- not just some people to succeed. There’s no caste system in the United States of America. Anybody who is willing to make the effort can succeed.
And part of why this is such an historical moment is, frankly, over the last decade that idea that ended up creating this emerging middle class that became the engine of our economic growth and the envy of the world has been pretty hard hit. Obviously it’s been hard hit by this recession, but I want to go before the recession. The period from 2001 to 2009, every middle-class family lost about 5 percent of its income. During that same period, job growth was more sluggish than it had been at any time since World War II. There was a sense on the part of, I think, a lot of ordinary Americans that no matter how hard they tried, it was becoming more and more difficult to make it.
And the things that helped to make America the envy of the world -- our infrastructure, our education system, our health care systems -- all those things had become -- had begun to break down in pretty substantial ways, so that whereas we used to rank number one in the proportion of college graduates, by 2009-2010, we ranked 9th or 10th. Our students now rank -- 15-year-olds typically rank 21st in science and 25th in math in the world, where we used to be number one.
Our health care system was broken, wildly expensive, leaving 30 million without health insurance and burdening families, businesses and the federal treasury, as well as state treasuries.
Our infrastructure, which used to be the best in the world, suddenly we have bridges that are falling apart, airports that are outdated and making a very unpleasant experience for those of you who still have to travel through commercial flights. I’ve got to admit I’ve got my own plane now, so it’s a little easier for me. (Laughter.)
And so when I ran for President two years ago, we already knew that we had to change direction, that we had to deal with some of these fundamental challenges that we’ve been putting off for years: education, energy, health care, infrastructure. We had to make sure that we were creating an environment in which people could, in fact, succeed, and they were rewarded for their hard work and their responsibility -- not for reckless risk-taking, not for short-term thinking.
This was all before the crisis hit -- the worst financial crisis that we’ve experienced since the Great Depression. So my first job, Barbara’s first job, Ben’s first job when we got back in -- when I was sworn in, in January of 2009, we had lost 4 million jobs in the six months that preceded me being sworn in, 750,000 the month that I was sworn in, 600,000 the month after that, 600,000 the month after that. My first job was to stop the crisis.
And we did that. And sometimes that took some unpopular decisions. But I wasn’t elected to do what was easy; I was elected to do what was right. And so since that time, over the course of 20th months, whereas we were -- the economy was shrinking when I took office, the economy is now growing again. Where we were losing jobs, we’ve now seen nine consecutive months of public-sector job growth -- of private-sector job growth.
So not only did we deal with the crisis, but we also started finally making progress on all those things that we’ve been putting off. So, Rajeev talked about clean energy and the efforts of his company. One of our first tasks in the Recovery Act was figuring out how do we not only boost demand and make sure that we’re dealing with this crisis, but also how do we invest in some long-term thinking. And so we made the largest clean energy investment in our history.
Then we said if we really want to jumpstart education, what do we need to do? And we started something called Race to the Top, that is now investing in competition in states all across the country, making sure that they’re focused on proven mechanisms to boost math learning and science learning, and make sure that we've got the best possible teachers in the classroom.
And then we said, well, how do we make sure that every young person can go to college once they get through that high school? And we shifted billions of dollars that were going to banks in the form of unwarranted subsidies and we took that money and we made sure that that money was going directly to student loans and Pell Grants so that young people would never feel as if they were barred from opportunity simply because they didn’t come from a wealthy family.
And, yes, then we took on health care -- because we understood that if we didn’t start taking it on now we would continue to see a system in which we were subsidizing a system that wasn’t working for too many Americans and too many businesses. And because of those efforts we now can say to the American people that if you don't have health insurance you’re going to be able to get health insurance. It’s affordable. And if you do have health insurance, then insurance companies are going to have to treat you fairly. And in the process, we're going to start making the system overall more efficient so that suddenly doctors and hospitals are thinking in more innovative ways about how we can improve system deliveries, and we suddenly are investing in health information technology, so instead of having multiple tests, you can take one test and have it emailed to every doctor and specialist that you're dealing with, and that over time we're going to bring down the cost of health care for everybody.
All these efforts we made because we had folks like Ben and Barbara there who were willing to think not about the next election, but about the next generation. And that's a hard thing for politicians to do -- because we live in an environment in which politics has become meaner and coarser than it used to be; where millions of dollars of negative ads are thrown at candidates; where, frankly, what used to be a spirit of occasional bipartisanship in order to get things done has now given way to constant partisanship so that over the last two years, we've had Republicans not supporting us even on issues that they used to sponsor simply because these were issues that we supported.
So it’s not easy for elected officials to think long term. And yet, because of the challenges we face, because or the emergency situation we were in, that's what we saw a whole bunch of legislators do. And I couldn't be prouder of what we accomplished together over the last two years.
But we also know that our work is unfinished. We were just talking about clean energy. The fact of the matter is, we still don't have an overarching energy policy that makes sense for the future -- for the 21st century. So we’ve got to make more investments in innovation, in research and development in clean energy -- because I want the solar panels and the wind turbines and the biodiesel and other clean-energy approaches that are available, I want those investments made right here in the United States of America. And in order for us to do that, I’ve got to have a Congress that, again, is willing to think long term.
We’ve still got a lot more work to do with respect to education reform. And when I see my Republican colleagues suggesting that we might cut education spending by 20 percent, at a time when I know that China and South Korea and Germany are not cutting education by 20 percent -- they understand this is going to be the single most important determinant of how well we’re able to compete in the 21st century. And I know that I’ve got to have some partners in Congress who understand what’s at stake.
We’ve got to rebuild our infrastructure. We just got started with the Recovery Act. Even though I know that there’s a lot of road work being done all across the country and here in Maryland as well, we still have $2 trillion worth of infrastructure that's crumbling, unattended to, that we’re going to have to rebuild. And what an opportunity -- at a time when interest rates are low, when contractors are coming in under budget, people are desperate for work, construction workers have been laid off because the housing bubble burst -- for us to put those folks back to work doing the work that America needs done.
We’ve still got to get control of our deficit in a serious way. And that's going to require more than just platitudes; it’s going to require tough choices. And the question is going to be do we have people in place who are making those choices not based on what’s politically expedient or what special interests are lobbying for, but rather what’s good for America over the long term.
So we’ve got a lot of work to do. I try to explain to folks who, in a town like Washington where everybody is watching the polls day to day, everybody is obsessed with sort of short-term thinking, I try to explain, we’re just in the first quarter. We’ve got a big chunk of the game left to play. And I need to have teammates who are thinking about that story that Rajeev told, that essential part of America that we have to make sure is there for the next generation, for these young people, an America in which everybody has opportunity.
And that's what this election is about. That's the choice in this election. Now, this is a difficult political environment right now. Unemployment is still 9.6 percent. And that means it doesn’t matter how good of a job you’ve done, people want to know what are you going to do now.
And the way I’ve been describing it around the country, it’s as if the Republicans drove the economy into the ditch. And Barbara and Ben and me, we’ve gone into the ditch, and we’ve been pushing the car out. (Laughter.) And we finally got the car out, and the Republicans suddenly tap us on the shoulder and say, well, we want the keys back -- after not having lifted a finger to help us get the car out of the ditch. And we have to explain to them, well, you know, you can’t have the keys back because you don't know how to drive. (Laughter.) You can drive with us. You can -- we’ll have to put you in the backseat. (Laughter.)
But it’s still a challenging environment. And so the support that you’re providing is going to make a difference in us making the case for why we’ve got to keep moving forward; why we can’t go backwards; why we can’t go back to the economic policies that resulted in this mess in the first place.
And I am absolutely confident that if all of you are talking to your friends and talking to your neighbors and talking to your coworkers, if we have the resources to be able to get our message out -- not just here in Maryland, but all across the country -- that the American people, they still want to dream big. They still believe in that story that Rajeev told because they know that it was true for their family, as well. It’s been true for generations of Americans.
I’ll close just by telling a quick story about the highlight not just of my day but probably of my week, maybe of my month.
We hosted a science fair today at the White House. This is the first time that we’d ever hosted a science fair at the White House. (Applause.) And the reason we did it was because I kept on having over these championship basketball teams and football teams. We had the Alabama Crimson Tide. We had the New Orleans Saints. We had the Los Angeles Lakers. And it’s a lot of fun having these great sports teams come by. And I said, but how about all these kids who are involved in science and math and engineering? Why aren’t we celebrating them?
So we hosted this science fair. And they actually set up exhibits in the State Dining Room. And this was just a sampling of some of the young people that we’d invited. And you walk through, and at each booth you met the most amazing young people you would ever care to -- ever care to meet.
There was a team from Tennessee that had designed a self-powered water filtration plant. It had a water wheel on it and it ran the battery that then filtered the water. And they explained that up in the Appalachian regions, a lot of homes still didn't have clean water and this was a cheap way to do it. For a thousand bucks, you could provide all the water that 60 or 70 families needed. Just designed it -- high school kids.
You had robots that were running around doing all kinds of things. (Laughter.) And there was a family -- young children who had emigrated from Turkey that were now in public schools here, and they had designed a whole town that would be more energy-efficient, and had created a whole model for how it could be done.
And then there was this -- the last person I spoke to was a young woman, looked like she was of Chinese heritage; lived in Dallas; 16 years old. When she was a freshman in high school, she studied biology and became interested in life sciences and became interested in cancer research. So she decided during the summer to teach herself chemistry -- (laughter) -- taught herself chemistry, and designed as a science project exploration of the development of a new cancer drug, based on some experimental cancer drugs that are currently being put together that involve injecting the drug and then it’s activated by light. And it allows a more localized treatment that isolates the cancer cells -- kills the cancer cells but leaves the healthy cells untouched.
And the problem is clinical trials and treatments have shown that it’s okay for skin cancer and other diseases where they're close to the surface, but it’s harder to penetrate. Bottom line is she decided she was going to design a new drug that would work better for harder-to-reach cancers -- having taught herself chemistry -- (laughter) -- at 16 years old.
She went on to win the international science competition. And now she and her teacher, her high school science teacher, are being approached by laboratories all across the country who want to collaborate with them in thinking about this new potential breakthrough cancer drug.
So I’m talking to her, pretending like I understand everything that she’s saying. (Laughter.) And I’m thinking to myself, think about what this means. You’ve got the portrait of Lincoln in the State Dining Room looking down over us. You’ve got an African American President named Barack Obama. You’ve got a young Chinese American girl, 16 years old, who is designing cancer drugs, having taught herself chemistry in high school. That idea of America is alive and well. But we have to nurture it, and we have to sustain it.
And for all the meanness of our political season and the yelling and nonsense that we see day in and day out on television, that is something that is worth remembering -- because I think sometimes during difficult times, some of us may get discouraged or lose heart.
I don't want you to be discouraged. Just think about those young people, think about the young people who are here. Think about Rajeev and his family and Seema and her family, and think about Barbara and Ben and their families, when they emigrated. That story continues. We just have to build on it. We have to have confidence in it.
And we have to remember that as long as we’re unified as opposed to divided, as long as we think towards the future and not just towards the present, that America will prosper, and that the 21st century will be the American Century, just as the 20th was.
Thank you so much, everybody. God bless you. (Applause.)
END 8:25 P.M. EDT
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)